Politics, News & Issues >
Energy Issues
Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedShould energy independence be a high priority in the US?
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 91% | 368 votes | Total: 403 votes | |
| No | 9% | 35 votes |
Yes
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesEnergy independence should absolutely be of the highest priority in the U.S. and it will be soon whether we like it or not.
Mankind has always sought energy sources to help produce work. An animal tethered to a mill or plow allowed early settlements to increase food production. Wood and coal ushered in the locomotive while solid rocket fuel enabled the exploration of space. The harnessing of external energy (that is, any source other than manpower) is the single most important catalyst of technological evolution and at the very foundation of civilization itself.
As people became more advanced so did their energy needs and today's world is completely dependent upon, and subject to, the world's available energy sources. Most of which do not exist in the U.S. As a result we've become dependent on foreign sources. You don't have to be a radical Jeffersonian isolationist to recognize the problems associated with foreign dependence of any kind, especially something as vital as energy.
Imagine if the U.S. aircraft industry of the 1940's had been dependent on BMW engines. WWII would have turned out a bit different. Now apply that same logic to any U.S. industry. While foreign collaboration has been profitable, dependence on such is not wise and leaves us vulnerable to the will of others.
Today we are faced with some inevitabilities that cannot be ignored. One of which is the now well known fact that we have exhausted over half of the world's known oil reserves. This means that our current sources are finite and will soon expire. Alternative sources must be developed and soon or the world as we know it will come to a screeching halt.
Another concern is that the U.S. is becoming less popular in the eyes of the world and has continued to do so at a steady rate since the second world war. Our grip on the world economy is being threatened by such things as the European Union which has the potential of becoming an even larger super power than the United States from an economic stand point. Although not likely, should Asia unite in a similar manner they could dominate us as well. Keep in mind that the U.S. constitutes only 6% of the world population.
The only logical move is to develop energy sources such as hydrogen fuel cells which are already in production in Europe. With 70% of the world being covered in water there would be an almost unlimited fuel supply available to us while ending foreign dependence. And, at the risk of opening a debate over the causes of war, it might reduce bloodshed as well.
While foreign energy collaboration should still be recognized as beneficial to the world economy, dependence equates to political suicide for any nation so foolish as to allow another country to control its' energy sources and therefore its' economy.
In my view energy independence is not even a subject for debate but rather a vital prerequisite to the future of this country.
Learn more about this author, Occam's Razor.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
The foremost problem which the American consumer is currently facing with respect to what is increasingly being called the "energy crisis" is the high cost of fuel required to power personal automobiles. Insomuch that the transportation industry is taking the lead in pioneering the use of bio-fuels, the American consumer is for all intents and purposes at the same time complacent and concerned, a dichotomy to be sure, because they do not appear to be taking a practical consensus-based approach to addressing the issue by saying only that they care and not acting on it.
When President Bush stood before the people in 2002 to inform them that by 2012 the U.S. would likely be meeting its energy requirements by buying 72 percent of its fossil fuels from foreign sources, the people heard him but they weren't listening. The next year, the best selling vehicle in the country was still the big pickup truck. The Ford F-Series pickup truck maintained that spot for over two decades leading to 2007 and that year saw the Chevrolet Silverado pickup truck place second in overall sales of new vehicles.
The lack of direct application by consumers to affect the amount of fuel purchased by driving only economical vehicles may be a reflection of the independent freedom of choice exercised by U.S. citizens as a constitutionally guaranteed right, but they are making it patently obvious that they are content to rely on Uncle Sam to somehow bail them out of this mess which their thirst for gasoline has put them in, sort of a socialist accommodation to their stubbornly selfish claim to freedom and independence.
One logical approach to resolving high energy costs, which would result in an increase in its availability, is through legislation targeted against private automobiles with engines larger than four cylinders and by placing a legal limit on their displacement. Another would be in providing some real incentives for adapting vehicles to use bio-fuels or other alternative sources of energy to offset the high cost. The government must show that it is serious in applying some real strategies to combat the high cost of fuel and to reduce dependence on foreign sources.
One might think that ideally, complete energy independence would solve all of America's energy problems, but just because dependence on foreign sources is eliminated does not necessarily make the fuel any more accessible to the consumer. Not only that, one wonders whether the strategy of reducing the dependency which the oil producing nations have had on the United States for a great portion of their revenues in the past would actually be a counter-productive measure. Would the OPEC nations be only too willing to raise the cost of oil if they could not meet their fiscal planning quotas, and how would this impact on developing nations who need a cheap source of oil? It is conceivable that an oil glut in the Middle East in the near future could very well turn the classical concept of price structure as it is tied to supply and demand on its head.
What is becoming clear is that application of a new ideology of responsible consumerism combined with strategic government initiatives to address the global need for cheap fuel sources is paramount to the success of the global community. Less needed is for Americans to turn inward in defiance of fair practice and simply continue buying their big pickup trucks. These are the priorities which should be addressed before the miracle of energy independence can be realized. This concern should be manifested globally, because America is not the only greedy culprit in the struggle for economic superiority.
Learn more about this author, Steve Lussing.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Energy Issues
- Will water become more valuable than oil?
- Does protecting the environment have to come at the expense of jobs?
- Should individuals take voluntary action to curb their energy consumption?
- Ending the moratorium on offshore drilling will lower gas prices in the future
- Should hardrock mining companies pay the US government a royalty on minerals extracted from federally owned lands, the way oil, natural gas and coal companies do?
- Which is more likely to produce clean alternative energy, the private sector or the government?
