Home > Politics, News & Issues > Environmental Issues > Energy Issues
Assuming we can capture and store emissions, should we continue to rely on coal as a primary energy source?
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 41% | 61 votes | Total: 150 votes | |
| No | 59% | 89 votes |
Yes
-
by iiivix
Created on: December 15, 2007
If we can eliminate emissions from coal plants, this carbon rich mineral can be used as a primary energy
-
by Paul Calhoun
Created on: March 10, 2008
Progress Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
Once again we in the USA have been chided by President
Join the Debate now.
Write your point of view.
No
-
by John Carr
Created on: October 10, 2008
All fossil fuels have something in common: They are spoils of plunder.
Our civilization is based on a
-
by Cindy Wagner
Created on: June 10, 2008
With the current energy crisis, many politicians are calling for expanded U.S. coal production and expanded
-
Created on: September 12, 2008
Even if you capture 100% of the emissions, which is not even what clean coal plants are proposing, coal
-
Created on: March 31, 2008
Should we rely on coal as a primary energy source? Coal and petroleum related products should not be
-
by Kat Derrig
Created on: March 19, 2008
Even assuming we can capture and store emissions, the US should not continue to rely on coal as a primary
Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills
Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all
INFORMATION
Copyright © 2002-2012 Helium, Inc. All rights reserved.
Helium.com: A Service of RR Donnelley