Home > Politics, News & Issues > Environmental Issues > Climate Change
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 56% | 81 votes | Total: 145 votes | |
| No | 44% | 64 votes |
Yes
Created on: December 30, 2008
281 bombs 62 million deaths
Imagine waking up in the morning turning on the news and hearing that 281
Created on: March 04, 2008
Certainly. The twenty-first century will be one of innovation, technological prowess and a shift to
by iiivix
Created on: December 15, 2007
Confronting global warming involves reducing green house emissions to zero. Since a nuclear plant gives
Created on: February 20, 2009
FACING GLOBAL WARMING WITHOUT NUCLEAR POWER - IT CAN BE DONE!
How can we face global warming without
Created on: December 21, 2007
Of course it can! The whole title begs several clarifications, from is global warming happening, through
Created on: September 01, 2010 Last Updated: September 02, 2010
The fear of nuclear explosion, fall out, or hazardous waste is usually reason enough to turn people
by G.R.L. Cowan
Created on: February 02, 2008
Imagine yourself trapped in a sunken submarine, like the SSN San Francisco if it had hit that undersea
Created on: January 28, 2008
Nuclear power could exasperate global warming. The reason is that mining and refining uranium takes
No
Created on: December 26, 2010 Last Updated: December 28, 2010
In a perfect world, the human race could deal with the burgeoning energy demand of seven billion humans
by Allan Taylor
Created on: April 12, 2010
I have voted NO for the reason that the US needs more reliable base-load electricity
Join the Debate now.
Write your point of view.