Home > Politics, News & Issues > Sports News & Opinion > Baseball News & Opinion
Results so far:
| Yes | 35% | 64 votes | Total: 183 votes | |
| No | 65% | 119 votes |
Yes
Created on: December 15, 2007 Last Updated: October 31, 2008
The Report to the Commissioner of Baseball of an Independent Investigation into the Illegal Use of Steroids and Other Performance Enhancing Substances by Players in Major League Baseball, known as the "Mitchell Report", is the result of former United States Senator George J. Mitchell's investigation into the use of anabolic steroids and human growth hormone in Major League Baseball (MLB). The 409-page report, released on December 13, 2007, covers the history of the use of illegal performance enhancing substances by players and the effectiveness of the MLB drug testing program. Mitchell also advances certain recommendations regarding the handling of past illegal drug use and future prevention practices. The report names 89 Major League Baseball players who are alleged to have used steroids or drugs. The day after the report was released President Bush, a former co-owner of the Texas Rangers, stated "we can jump to this conclusion: that steroids have sullied the game." He said he had no prior knowledge or awareness of player steroid use. He added, "My hope is that this report is a part of putting the steroid era of baseball behind us."
George Mitchell, a former United States senator and prosecutor, was appointed by baseball commissioner Bud Selig on March 30, 2006 to investigate the use of performance-enhancing drugs in MLB. Mitchell was appointed during a time of controversy over the book Game of Shadows, which chronicles alleged extensive use of performance-enhancing drugs, including several different types of steroids and growth hormone by Barry Bonds. Bud Selig decided to initiate the process of investigating the illegal use of steroids and performance enhancing drugs after reading Game of Shadows. The appointment was made after several influential members of the US Congress made negative comments about the effectiveness and honesty of MLB anti-performance enhancing drugs policies. The 409-page report was released on December 13, 2007.
Mitchell reports that the Players Association was "largely uncooperative". According to Mitchell, the Players Association effectively discouraged players from cooperating with the investigation. In a memorandum to players, the Players Association advised, "...while Senator Mitchell pledges in his memo that he will honor any player request for confidentiality in his report, he does not pledge, because he cannot pledge, that any information you provide will actually remain confidential and not be disclosed without your consent. For example, Senator Mitchell cannot promise that information you disclose will not be given to a federal or state prosecutor, a Congressional committee, or even turned over in a private lawsuit in response to a request or a subpoena (a legally enforceable order)."[6]
Only two active players who were interviewed were named in the report. Frank Thomas was one of five players who were interviewed because of their public statements on the issue, but was the only one of the five willing to be mentioned by name. Also interviewed was admitted steroid user Jason Giambi. Over 700 people were interviewed during the investigation.[7] Of 500 former players contacted, 68 agreed to be interviewed, and three others had interviews arranged by law enforcement.[7] Interviews with current or former club officials, managers, coaches, team physicians, athletic trainers, or resident security agents accounted for another 550 interviews.[7] The teams and the Commissioner's Office supplied Mitchell with more than 115,000 pages of documents and 2,000 electronic documents.[7]
One of the witnesses, Kirk Radomski, a former New York Mets clubhouse employee, "provided substantial information about the distribution of performance enhancing substances."[8] In April of 2007, Radomski pleaded guilty to illegal distribution of a variety of substances. Many of the players named in the report were indicated to be clients of Radomski.
Mitchell reported that during the random testing in 2003, 5 to 7 percent of players tested postive for steroid use. According to the report, after mandatory random testing began in 2004, Human Growth Hormone (HGH) became the substance of choice among players, as it is not detectable in tests.[9] Also, it was noted that at least one player from each of the thirty Major League Baseball teams was involved in the alleged violations.[10]
In all, 89 former and current major-league players are named in the report.[4][2] Among the many players implicated in the report were several well-known players such as Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, Andy Pettitte, Miguel Tejada, and Eric Gagn along with these All-Stars the list also went on to include lesser known players such as Zach Soskin, Jeffry Lurie, and Josh Parish.[11]
Mitchell expressed his hope that readers of the report will look past the players' names that are included in the report and focus on the conclusions he reached during his investigation. Mitchell presents his conclusions in five sections.[12]
1. Major League Baseball's 2002 response to steroid use resulted in players switching from detectable steroids to undetectable human growth hormone.[12]
2. Players that use performance enhancing substances are legally and ethically "wrong."[12]
3. While players that use illegal substances are responsible for their actions, that responsibilty is shared by the entire baseball community for failing to recognize the problem sooner.[12]
4. An exhaustive investigation attempting to identify every player that has used illegal substances would not be beneficial.[12]
5. Major League Baseball should adopt the recommendations of the report as a first step in eliminating the use of illegal substances.[12]
On December 12, 2007, the day before the report was to be released, Bud Selig said regarding his decision to commission the report, "I haven't seen the report yet, but I'm proud I did it."[13][14]
After the report was released, Selig held his own press conference at 4:30 pm EST at the Waldorf-Astoria in Manhattan.[4] In the press conference, Selig said regarding Mitchell's report, "His report is a call to action. And I will act."[11] Selig indicated that it is possible that some of the players named in the report may face disciplinary actions. "Discipline of players and others identified in this report will be determined on a case-by-case basis. If warranted, those decisions will be made swiftly," said Selig.[15]
Donald Fehr, executive director of the Major League Baseball Player's Association, held his news conference at 6:00 pm EST December 13, 2007. Fehr expressed his disappointment that the Union was not given a chance to read the report beforehand. He accepted some responsibility for the steroid problems but expressed concern for how the league would treat the players named in the report.[16]
Roger Clemens has been deemed the most standout name of the list. The 7-time Cy Young winner has yet to respond to the allegations, but his attorney has denied that Clemens ever used steroids or HGH.
Learn more about this author, Mitchell Thomas.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: January 09, 2008 Last Updated: October 31, 2008
The release of former senator George Mitchell's report on the use of performance enhancing drugs in Major League Baseball (MLB) was an important day for the sport and fans wholly let out a collective "finally" under their breath. To say, however, that the Mitchell Report will ruin baseball or its credibility in the eyes of the media and fans would be pretty naive and would largely be insulting the intelligence of anyone who follows the sport.
It has not been a secret to anyone that drug use in professional sports, and particularly baseball, has been a large problem for a long time. For those that weren't skeptical by the Brady Anderson's and Albert Belle's of the world in the mid-90's, there were the Luis Gonzalez's, Mark McGwire's and Sammy Sosa's of the late '90's. Anderson, a former outfielder for the Boston Red Sox, Baltimore Orioles, and Cleveland Indians played between 1988 and 2002. In his first eight seasons in the league he averaged just nine home-runs a season. In 1996, he managed to knock out 50. This was a time where 50 homers was simply not a big deal anymore. Gonzalez has a similiar story. In nine seasons in the big leagues Gonzalez had hit a career high 23 homers and in that period held a career batting average near the high .260's. In 1999, he began a torrid streak at the plate. From 1999-2003 Gonzalez was elected to the all-star game four times. In those five years he batted below .304 just once (.288) and managed to average 33.6 homers a season and even hit out a monstrous 57 in 2001. He also made the MVP balloting three times in this run and drove 100-plus runs in each of those seasons. The McGwire and Sosa stories are also not new.
After the BALCO scandal was revealed in "Game of Shadows" by Mark Fainaru-Wada and Lance Williams, Barry Bonds, the face of the era because of his complete destruction of all home-run records, and a slew of more names were revealed in March of 2006.
The fans knew and accepted these terms. What's the key component here? The timing. The Mitchell Report was released in late 2007, far after everyone in the baseball universe knew of the steroid problem. The real success of the report was the fact that we saw some accountability and at least some guys get punished, not by Major League Baseball or the courts, but by public embarrassment and scrutiny. Even if there was a questioning of the guard relating to steroids, it would have happened when this information was new or fresh. Some of the names in the Mitchell Report may be fresh, but the issue isn't and the scope is and has since the early 2000's been pretty generously estimated by most fans and analysts on the suspecting extent of drug use.
The fact that Major League Baseball has never been as popular as it is now bringing in record profits in 2007 should be evidence that the baseball will not be wrecked. The fans are not proud of their steroid past nor do they condone it. The fans want closure and most welcomed this report. The fans want to know how to look back at the '90's and early 2000's and be able to make their own judgments on what should or shouldn't be done.
Many Olympians have been caught cheating with similar drugs. I have personally never heard someone say they don't watch the Olympics because of the consistent catching of "cheaters" trying to gain an edge. I think the reason for this is that the fans of sport just want to see that there is someone or something out there making an effort to keep the playing field level. The Mitchell Report was great for baseball because it gives the fans something to see that their concerns for the drug problem are being heard.
Mitchell recommended in the report that Major League Baseball do nothing to punish those from the past named in the report but instead focus on the present and the future largely because he probably knows these player's legacies are tarnished forever without any action by Bud Selig. The fans The fans know what happened in baseball prior to the release of the report and to question the fans' knowledge of this is demeaning and simply insulting their intelligence.
It will honestly take a lot more to kill American's love for Major League Baseball. Baseball is our pastime and one of the oldest running institutions in our young nation.
Learn more about this author, David Wysocki.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.