Results so far:
| Yes | 84% | 283 votes | Total: 335 votes | |
| No | 16% | 52 votes |
An idle mind is the devils playground. Advice I would give parents of teens and adolescents as a Coach and Educator. The fact is kids often fall prey to two dangerous time thieves. First, the video game zone where time is spent without much to show for it after hours and in some cases days of effort. Second, the types of kids that avoid extracurriculars and just 'hang out' are usually ones to avoid.
I would caution that the wording of this topic is misleading. Children especially those in public schools are subjected to an incredible amount and variety of peer pressures. They are expected to meet the standards of whatever group they belong to. For instance Goths like piercing, dark make-up, and often view society through very jaded eyes. Skaters are the answer for kids who would otherwise be surfers but lack a coast. They live to skate and generally avoid other trappings of a non-skate lifestyle. Then the typical groupings; Jocks, preppies, stoner's, geeks, and a host of other social / cultural monikers that are applied to kids in an effort to classify them within a school setting. The trick is to promote groups that have a more positive peer pressure which helps reinforce your own teachings about values, actions, and consequences.
As a Coach my job was to build a young person of character through the medium of athletic or forensic competition. In football I always emphasized the role of a player on and off the field as a leader who will not follow a crowd into trouble. While running the debate team I tried to foster intellectualism that included being smarter than doing drugs or other pitfalls of the school social / cultural scene. In any activity the leadership sets up expectations of behavior that foster positive vice negative choices. However, it was often the Varsity or older members of the activity that had the greatest influence on impressionable younger members. Coach Johnson could preach it, but the Varsity linebacker had the greatest influence when he avoid parties with alcohol and antics that proved the 'dumb jock' viewpoint.
Another factor is whether or not you as a parent support the ideals behind extracurricular activities. Your support is not just dropping them off for practice or events. It is your active participation in it also. Football parents who support the team win or lose. Debate parents who would help with research or listen to a practice speech. Actions like that show a student you value them and what they choose to do. Heck even my Goth kids were ethical and decent people when their parents stayed involved in their lives and valued their pursuits both academic and cultural. The key being parental involvement that validates the aims of any extra-curricular activity. Parents who are looking for another sitter just like the day at school are going to find kids resent or rebel against absentee parenting.
With all of this said it is possible that even with a busy extracurricular schedule the kid will make some bad choices that create negative consequences. That is part of the growing and learning process of life. Your kids are not miniature adults. Even with adult sized bodies they need time and guidance to develop an adult sized brain. Sure my Debate kids and Football players made some dumb choices. The key being they had a support system of other participants, caring coaches, and active parents to help them weather such storms of life. The alternative is a kid screws up and is alone to figure it out. The old wisdom is we all make mistakes, why not make them among friends and allies?
Learn more about this author, T. M. Beeker.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
If there was a neutral voting option when answering this debate, I would select it. For you see, I am slightly in between, but I will elaborate on both sides.
To be accepted, kids will and have done many inappropriate things. Whether it be doing drugs, having sex, or other such things. Some do it to be accepted into the group, for before they may have been considered outcasts. Others, however, do it to "maintain" that acceptance or being "cool"/"stupid". Frankly, though doing those things can get you "in", it also may be needed to be done to stay "in".
So could an alternative for those outcasts, be to get into these extra-curricular activities? For they do, indeed, help to boost confidence. I know it from personal experience. But can these activities help to usher along the participation of these inappropriate activities? Yes.
This topic is like gun control; there is no right and wrong for the completely general issue. You have to look at the smaller details, and come up with answers for them. And sometimes, everything can have a wrong answer to it. Sometimes, any choice of any matter can lead to doing drugs, or having sex, or eating babies. It depends on the people. Most of my friends at school are stoners. And yet do I do drugs? Hell no. Am I pressured into doing them? Not really. Most of the time, and ironically enough, it is my stoner friends who talk about quitting smoking/doing drugs more than the supposed "cool" students, who do them to keep being cool.
But would that be the same in other schools? Probably not. Just because people are in the same clique, does not mean they think the same way. Take me for example. Like I just said, I am in the mostly "stoner" clique. And how many stoners do you think can write like this, and have these sorts of thoughts?
Anyways, kids with low self-esteem should participate is extra-curricular activities to help their self-esteem. But that is not the only task they must embark upon; the only initiative they must take. For when you are in the spot-light-or at least more noticed-you're actually more likely to be pressured into doing drugs. So they would need the fortitude to resist those pressures. While these activities might give kids the fortitude to resist temptations, outcasts may not need it, for if they have practically no friends and rarely interact with anyone else, then there'd be no one to pressure them into doing drugs, in the first place. But then those "outcasts" might pressure THEMSELVES into doing drugs, to try and get friends, who then might pressure the former outcast into doing more drugs/other inappropriate things.
I feel like I'm going in circles; much is the result of many issues like this. I can never get a straight answer, as there really never is one.
But here is a question: what does it take for a kid to resist the temptation of drugs? Let's summarize.
Extra-curr icular activities? Not necessarily, for then it gives the person participating more people who try to pressure him or her into doing drugs.
Be an outcast? An outcast might do them to be accepted, possibly actually pressuring HIMSELF.
Have some balls? YES!
There is no magical solution to make a kid resist these temptations, nor will any method work for every kid. Kids react in different ways to different situations. I am currently in no clubs, no sports teams, and yet do not do drugs. Fortitude does not have to be brought upon by those things, but simply a belief in one's self. Or finding any hobby in general. Or, simply having a logical outlook on life.
Logically thinking, drugs would shorten my life.
Logically thinking, drugs would cost me money I could spend on other, more beneficial things.
Logically thinking, drugs offer nothing but a somewhat "enjoyable" hallucinatory state, which often might get me into more trouble than they are worth.
So if someone can think that way, then that might be enough to keep that person from doing drugs.
But people should do extra-curricular activities anyways, for they are fun, and help self-esteem. But whether or not that self-esteem will help a kid resist doing drugs depends on that kid's personality.
You know, sports and clubs actually might turn kids into arrogant fools. Those tend to be the "bullies". Jocks whose egos have been too very much inflated by their endeavors. Not ALL jocks are like that, of course. Just many of them. And this example falls into the "depends on the person" category, to determine whether or not that person's ego would be boosted too far by the accomplishments.
Alri ght, I'm tired of talking in circles. It's making me dizzy.
My summary: DEPENDS ON THE PERSON!
(Props to you if you managed to understand everything I said, and understand that things simply are not as simplistic that they can be answered with either "yes" or "no".)
Learn more about this author, Nicholas A. Levack.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.