Politics, News & Issues >
Environmental Awareness
Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedIs loud music an environmental toxin?
Results so far:
| Yes | 61% | 108 votes | Total: 178 votes | |
| No | 39% | 70 votes |
Yes
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesIS LOUD MUSIC AN ENVIRONMENTAL TOXIN?
The answer to the question whether loud music is an environmental toxin has got to be yes simply because noise is an environmental toxin, whether it is music or not. Some people if they do not like that type of music will consider it toxic, while if they like it they will say it's not toxic.
However, there are some types of music today where the base line is raised to such a level it causes change in your heartbeat. That is definitely toxic. But then any kind of noise beyond a certain decibel level has to be considered toxic. Airplane engines are noisy, that noise is toxic. Many school children have been diagnosed with hearing loss from the music they listen to plugged into their ears. Many airport employees have been diagnosed with hearing loss because of airplane noise.
Some people definitely make differences where they do not exist. Noise is noise. But there are also noises which occur in nature, such as thunder and volcanic eruptions. The major difference here is that these noises come and go. Thunderclaps do not go on and on, and volcanic noise does not go on for hours at a time the way airports are noisy and the way some people play loud music for hours on end.
Then we may also ask the question, where does the noise go? If a volcano erupts in an area where there are no people such as in Greenland, is the area polluted? For how long will it remain so if it is? What about those volcanoes under the ocean floor? Do they make noise?
In any case, loud music, and loud traffic and all other man-made noises should be controlled in some manner or the other, whether government regulates the level at which the noise may be maintained or otherwise. On the other hand, now that man can make such noise by whatever means, how do we stop it? It would be like trying to stop scientific investigation. What should be allowed and what not? And who is going to be the one to decide that?
Many things that are considered to have been for man's benefit have been noisy, such as airplanes. But factories are noisy places too, should they be banned? What is the right thing to do in such a case? Where would we be without inconveniences and environmental toxins? Are they necessary? Has there ever been progress without a corresponding inconvenience or harmful effect? It's like the atomic bomb. Each invention's good has to be weighed against its bad. But then again, who decides?
Learn more about this author, Diane Hodge.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Toxin is defined as poisons produced from certain plants, animals, and bacteria. Music, regardless of the content or loudness does not fall under either of these categories.
I have to admit that yes when there is this little car that pulls up beside me with music, or what ever it is they call that noise today, so loud and turned all the way to the bass side that you can feel your vehicle shake is very, very annoying. I have raised three boys and have been told that some of the music they listen too just sounds better when it is loud. Well, maybe, I remember when I was younger and listening to Patsy Cline and George Jones, etc., that I too liked the music loud. However, I think it might be correct to say that that was music, and what they listen to is just screaming today. Nevertheless, does that make a difference? It is the difference in the generations.
Now if the question was does the music our children are listening to today affect some of their behaviors, I would have to say yes. However, it is not the question. No I do not feel that loud music is an environmental toxin. It does not affect foliage growth, it does not affect business sales, it does not affect the drinking water.
Even though some may believe it is a toxin if it doesn't affect our life of survival it is not a toxin. It doesn't contaminate the soil or the air we breath, and it does not cause cancer. It possibly could affect the ones in the vehicle ears, and that is possible but not as possible as if they were wearing ear phones listening to it that high.
To consider loud music an environmental toxin would be wrong. It is not deadly. There are a lot worse things the ones listening to music could be doing and that would be drugs, alcohol, and cigarettes. These are environmental toxins that affect not only them but also others around them.
Therefore, in conclusion, think twice when you hear that loud music coming from the automobile beside you, they could be doing a lot worse with themselves and others than just listening to loud music. If it bothers you, close your windows for the short time they are beside you.
Learn more about this author, Lolita Morand.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Environmental Awareness
- Have we become a throw-away society?
- Are new nuclear plants a good idea?
- Is the current "green wave" good for the environment?
- Are US national parks at risk because of global warming?
- Is light pollution contributing to cancer rates?
- Which is a more cost-effective and equitable way to bring down carbon emissions: A "cap and trade" program or a carbon tax?
