Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Energy Issues

Is increasing nuclear power's share of our power generation worth the risks?

Results so far:

Yes
57% 91 votes Total: 161 votes
No
43% 70 votes
  • 1 of 8

    by B Smith

    Many argue that taking advantage of this source of energy will cost too much, or that source of energy will take too long to develop, or that drilling in ANWAR won't have any no...read more

  • 2 of 8

    by Mak

    It is worth taking the risk. We have to think about our futures, oils will not be there forever. Oil stocks are being exhausted fast and in coming years there will be no oil. Ho...read more

  • by Native Texan

    Building more nuclear power stations is definitely worth more than the risks involved. The biggest risk is that the rabid environmentalists will prevent additional nuclear power...read more

  • 4 of 8

    by Bryan Jennings

    Nuclear power has had a very poor PR record for rather unjustified reasons. It is once again a case of fear taking the place of common sense when discussing vitally important is...read more

  • 5 of 8

    by Daniel Walch

    Regardless of the ravings of radical environmentalists, nuclear power is a very clean energy source. The cost of storing radioactive waste is negligible if compared to the long-...read more

  • 6 of 8

    by G.R.L. Cowan

    Should we accept the risks of an increased nuclear share in our power generation? Must our answer have 350 or more words? OK. For an increase in risk there should be some com...read more

  • 7 of 8

    by Caine

    When people hear the words "nuclear power" they immediately think Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. They think nuclear incidents, mutations, poisoned water, and homicidal hillbil...read more

  • 8 of 8

    by Chris Stewart

    We are rapidly approaching the "event horizon" of energy consumption across the world. Led by the United States (though developing countries such as China are quickly catching ...read more

  • 1 of 2

    by Gary Sachs

    No. Nuclear is too slow and too expensive to be worth the risks. Too slow. To build a reactor and to site it locally in the US takes years. Granted the Nuclear Regulatory Com...read more

  • by David Kislik

    Absolutely not. First of all, our energy crisis and global warming issues are not going to be solved in one fatal swoop. Second, nuclear power may not be efficient in certain ar...read more

Join the Debate now.
Write your point of view.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA