Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 40% | 95 votes | Total: 238 votes | |
| No | 60% | 143 votes |
Since the Industrial Revolution littered the skies of London, the bullish march of technology continues to quicken its pace. Charles Dickens commented in his work, A Tale of Two Cities, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." Although published in 1859, this assessment certainly rings true in modern America. We live in one of the most prosperous civilizations of all time when measured in material wealth. As we contemplate the fate of our planet on Earth day, one question must be asked; are we making the world better or worse?
Nineteenth Century England was both the brightest and darkest times Britons had ever seen up to that point. The shimmer of progress and profits shone brilliantly for those who weren't doomed to twelve-hour work days in the factories. For the working class, dark clouds of ash dimmed the few hours of daylight they were able to spend outside.
Today, things have gotten better for both the profit seeker and the worker; at least in industrialized nations. Improved labor standards have forced large corporations to become even larger multi-national corporations, often with larger profits than GDP of small nations. Corporate giants have not yet been forced to deal with their adverse effects on the planet. Industrialized nations like the US and Western Europe enacted environmental standards which were easily avoided by outsourcing production to less-developed countries which lacked the infrastructure to enforce clean industry. For these countries, the need to provide jobs to its impoverished people was the main concern so they opened the doors to corporations and have largely ignored the economic cost.
Developed nations may finally be on the brink of making a change thanks to explosive oil prices. Only last year, the price of oil per barrel was around $60. Oil rose to a new record of over $123 per barrel on May 7, 2008. Rising oil prices have been forcing consumers and auto manufacturers to do some soul searching. Two years ago, bio-fuels were virtually unheard of, but today gas stations across the US are beginning to provide the alternative to fossil-fuel. Toyota produced the Prius in response to consumer's demand for fuel-economy. It has quickly become the darling of consumers seeking a fuel-efficient hybrid vehicle which boasts up to 50 miles per gallon.
Another factor in saving the planet is reducing greenhouse gas emissions like CO2. According to the US Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory report, which lists CO2 emissions by sector, electricity generation accounted for 2,343.9 million metric tons in 2006. The total US greenhouse gas emissions were 7,075.6 for the same year. By switching our power generation to renewable resources that don't rely on fossil-fuels, we can virtually eliminate one third of the total greenhouse gas emissions.
In the name of clean energy and energy independence, local governments are getting involved when the federal government fails to act. Oregon and Washington, for example, issue tax credits to homeowners and businesses who install solar panels on their homes. In the state of Washington, an initiative was passed which requires the state's largest electric utilities to supply 15 percent of their electricity sales from renewable resources by 2020. Local governments around the country are working to encourage the production of bio-fuels. From solar paneled roof-tops to electricity generating windmills, and bio-fuels, the renewable energy revolution has begun.
Over the next few years developed nations like the US, Japan and EU members, will continue to build their sustainable energy infrastructures so that dirty power production is eventually eliminated. Instead of burning coal for power or creating radioactive waste from nuclear plants, developed nations will come to rely more heavily on power production which needs no fuel. Windmills will cover barren hills and solar panels will harness the power of the desert sun using land that is worthless to farmers. There is also the promise of geothermal energy which derives its energy from the ever building pressure of volcanic activity below the earth's surface and tidal energy. Tidal energy seeks to use the pull of the tides to generate power. All of these methods have one thing in common; they do not produce greenhouse gasses.
Though innovation must begin in developed nations, due to their available capital for research, developing nations are sure to follow suit as technology improves. Sustainable energy production will increase in efficiency and decrease in cost as billions of dollars are poured into research. The time will soon come where an established sustainable energy technologies will become more economical than current methods which rely on depleting resources which are often found in the hands of undemocratic nations. Without getting into the argument over global warming, weaning ourselves away from so called "dirty" power, we will certainly achieve a cleaner world for our children.
Industriali sm began with blackened skies over Britain and continues much the same all around the world today. Until recently, there was no solution to saving the planet other than denouncing modern technology altogether. As developing nations like China and India continue to grow at a startling pace, our net pollution output will likely continue to increase over the short-term. Luckily, the laws of supply and demand are in the Earth's favor. The struggle for limited oil and coal resources will only worsen until supplies are completely drained. Watch hopefully as oil prices increase, because that will spell its inevitable doom. Renewable resources will begin to look cheap by comparison and the revolution will be complete. So fear not my fellow earthlings, technology will save the world!
Learn more about this author, Ryan Weber.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
I'm only 25, yet I feel that the world has changed immensely with respect to technology and its ever-growing advances. Every day it seems as though some new form of communication or music device is created to benefit our demanding need for 'top of the line' and innovation. However great our intentions are, the deepening desires to reign supreme over the technology world have led to the eventual man-made evolution of superior forms of combat artillery and mineral-depleting modes of transportation. Sure, we have our hybrid cars and eco-friendly paints. There are the vegans and the vegetarians who crusade to only consume what's necessary and humane. NATO and other intra-governmental organizations stand strong in an attempt to avoid nuclear devastation. But, truthfully, are we pretending to care about Mother Earth simply to feel better about what we do daily, or are we just afraid of what will ultimately happen should we continue to abuse the things we take for granted?
There was a time, years ago, when cellular phones were for the elite or yuppie greed group of individuals that line the NASDAQ floor every workday. Now, it doesn't even shock us to see 5th graders talking to their friends or family members while waiting for the bus after school, clearly causing social interaction to become more of a fad than a learning process associated with growing up. Computers were once stored in large server rooms, only used by NASA and other government agencies to shoot satellite and rockets into space for exploration purposes. Now, some systems operate on devices as small as a credit card, and have lead to the every-growing, and more often than not uncontrollable, cyber disease of viruses and spyware. Banking was once considered safe and the go-to for people looking to save for retirement, buy a house, or go on vacation. Now, as if in a cruel twist of irony, rarely do we find someone who even has a savings account, and even more rare are those not affected by identity theft or the greed of brokers who have used technology and the consumer's lack of understanding to manipulate their lifelong goals into instant losses and heartache. And even at this very moment, thousands of miles away, on a small patch of land just off the coast of the most populated geographical expanse in the world, a dictator has continued to flex is wavering infatuation with total annihilation by progressively becoming more and more of a war-time threat by shooting off long-range missiles. The fear and panic may not seem apparent now, but it's there, and soon it may reach the point of no return.
My point is simply this: technology seems to only be a positive term in our lexicon. But what truly has it given us? Deforestation and species extinction has only ever been an issue because of overpopulation and the advancement of human development. War is only prevalent and a concern because of artillery combat driven by the biggest gun that makes the biggest impact. Hydrogen-electric cars may save gas and prolong street life, yet they consume many more natural resources than do traditional automobiles in the manufacturing process. I'm not saying that technological evolution shouldn't happen, ever. I'm glad and feel honored to have been alive during a time where the world truly changed. I would agree that collaborative inventions from all spectrums of the industry have brought the world to anyone's fingertips. The problem I see is that our interests appear to only be geared in one single direction. It wasn't until some keen individuals starting pointing out that nuclear bombs were widely out-of-control that NATO and alike groups decided to call for a worldwide disarmament of nuclear warheads. Too little, too late maybe. And it wasn't until it was found that aerosol cans and car exhausts were destroying the ozone that new emissions standards and packaging techniques were implemented to help ease the deterioration of our atmosphere. It just seems that for all of the extremely intelligent people we have running the world's most powerful countries, perhaps they should rethink how they build or design their next great idea into reality for the rest of us to consume. Optimistic...? Not in the least.
Learn more about this author, Kristin Jackman.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.