Join | Log in

Show All Channels Show All Channels
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Environment (Other)

Will technology spare the earth?

Results so far:

Yes
39% 69 votes Total: 176 votes
No
61% 107 votes
Yes

Since the Industrial Revolution littered the skies of London, the bullish march of technology continues to quicken its pace. Charles Dickens commented in his work, A Tale of Two Cities, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." Although published in 1859, this assessment certainly rings true in modern America. We live in one of the most prosperous civilizations of all time when measured in material wealth. As we contemplate the fate of our planet on Earth day, one question must be asked; are we making the world better or worse?

Nineteenth Century England was both the brightest and darkest times Britons had ever seen up to that point. The shimmer of progress and profits shone brilliantly for those who weren't doomed to twelve-hour work days in the factories. For the working class, dark clouds of ash dimmed the few hours of daylight they were able to spend outside.

Today, things have gotten better for both the profit seeker and the worker; at least in industrialized nations. Improved labor standards have forced large corporations to become even larger multi-national corporations, often with larger profits than GDP of small nations. Corporate giants have not yet been forced to deal with their adverse effects on the planet. Industrialized nations like the US and Western Europe enacted environmental standards which were easily avoided by outsourcing production to less-developed countries which lacked the infrastructure to enforce clean industry. For these countries, the need to provide jobs to its impoverished people was the main concern so they opened the doors to corporations and have largely ignored the economic cost.

Developed nations may finally be on the brink of making a change thanks to explosive oil prices. Only last year, the price of oil per barrel was around $60. Oil rose to a new record of over $123 per barrel on May 7, 2008. Rising oil prices have been forcing consumers and auto manufacturers to do some soul searching. Two years ago, bio-fuels were virtually unheard of, but today gas stations across the US are beginning to provide the alternative to fossil-fuel. Toyota produced the Prius in response to consumer's demand for fuel-economy. It has quickly become the darling of consumers seeking a fuel-efficient hybrid vehicle which boasts up to 50 miles per gallon.

Another factor in saving the planet is reducing greenhouse gas emissions like CO2. According to the US Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory report, which lists CO2 emissions by sector, electricity generation accounted for 2,343.9 million metric tons in 2006. The total US greenhouse gas emissions were 7,075.6 for the same year. By switching our power generation to renewable resources that don't rely on fossil-fuels, we can virtually eliminate one third of the total greenhouse gas emissions.

In the name of clean energy and energy independence, local governments are getting involved when the federal government fails to act. Oregon and Washington, for example, issue tax credits to homeowners and businesses who install solar panels on their homes. In the state of Washington, an initiative was passed which requires the state's largest electric utilities to supply 15 percent of their electricity sales from renewable resources by 2020. Local governments around the country are working to encourage the production of bio-fuels. From solar paneled roof-tops to electricity generating windmills, and bio-fuels, the renewable energy revolution has begun.

Over the next few years developed nations like the US, Japan and EU members, will continue to build their sustainable energy infrastructures so that dirty power production is eventually eliminated. Instead of burning coal for power or creating radioactive waste from nuclear plants, developed nations will come to rely more heavily on power production which needs no fuel. Windmills will cover barren hills and solar panels will harness the power of the desert sun using land that is worthless to farmers. There is also the promise of geothermal energy which derives its energy from the ever building pressure of volcanic activity below the earth's surface and tidal energy. Tidal energy seeks to use the pull of the tides to generate power. All of these methods have one thing in common; they do not produce greenhouse gasses.

Though innovation must begin in developed nations, due to their available capital for research, developing nations are sure to follow suit as technology improves. Sustainable energy production will increase in efficiency and decrease in cost as billions of dollars are poured into research. The time will soon come where an established sustainable energy technologies will become more economical than current methods which rely on depleting resources which are often found in the hands of undemocratic nations. Without getting into the argument over global warming, weaning ourselves away from so called "dirty" power, we will certainly achieve a cleaner world for our children.

Industrialism began with blackened skies over Britain and continues much the same all around the world today. Until recently, there was no solution to saving the planet other than denouncing modern technology altogether. As developing nations like China and India continue to grow at a startling pace, our net pollution output will likely continue to increase over the short-term. Luckily, the laws of supply and demand are in the Earth's favor. The struggle for limited oil and coal resources will only worsen until supplies are completely drained. Watch hopefully as oil prices increase, because that will spell its inevitable doom. Renewable resources will begin to look cheap by comparison and the revolution will be complete. So fear not my fellow earthlings, technology will save the world!

Learn more about this author, Ryan Weber.
Contact this writer Click here to send Author comments or questions.

No

No, technology - by itself - won't spare the earth. Many of the problems we face here on earth are caused by the improper use of technology. Why would more technology spare us from our fate?

Expecting "technology" to solve mankind's problems is like expecting Jesus or Mohammed or advanced beings from deep space to save us, without any effort on our part. That seems to be the way we think, though, isn't it?

I mean no disrespect for Jesus or Moses or Mohammed. On the contrary: They gave us useful instructions on how to live in peace and prosperity. For one reason or the other, though, the majority of our species have generally disregarded these universal instructions. Simple instructions, such as "Thou shalt not kill" are ignored on a regular basis by the high and mighty and the rank and file citizens follow dutifully along.

Injunctions against greed and sloth are likewise ignored, leading to much unwise use of the technologies we already have. Is one more technology "the hair of the dog that bit us"? Are we looking for some wondrous remedy that will permit us to go on living in the inane way most of us do - and now the developing world wants to enjoy the same shallow pleasures.

How is more technology, without more wisdom in its use, going to save us from the cascading negative effects we have caused over the centuries? Some powerful new technology in the hands of unevolved morons like the ones who "work" in the White House would just speed our collective demise.

The lack of that one magic technological improvement to correct the damage we've done with the last ten technologies we've discovered is not our problem. Our problem is emotional and spiritual immaturity. We don't know what to do with the technologies we have discovered.

For example, mankind has harnessed nuclear energy and used it primarily to threaten and occasionally wreak havoc on our enemies. It has also been used to generate a lot of electricity over the years, with an admirable safety record when handled with due respect by intelligent and conscientious workers. Why isn't this technology used more extensively, as the French do, to provide for our energy needs. If we think clean energy is the solution to our major problem, then why not use nuclear energy? Other nations, such as France, have successfully used nuclear reactors to provide much of their electricity needs, why do Americans believe it can't be done safely?

I have to admit I'm only guessing at the intent of this question. Will technology spare the earth from WHAT? From global warming? From the next Ice Age? From the die off of our species due to famine, weird viruses, and polar reversals? Perhaps it is creeping Republicanism we need a new technology to cure.

Are we confusing technology with an energy source? What did we do with our last big dollop of gooey black energy? I know Hollywood uses a lot of it to create car chases for our amusement. And the US military uses an exaggerated ammount in trying to capture and control the oil reserves of tiny, beaten down nations like Iraq without much success.

Petroleum is not a technology. It is a depleting, dirty, finite source of a crude type of energy. According to James Howard Kunstler, author of "The Long Emergency," it is a one-time gift which humanity has squandered on moving a lot of frivolous merchandise from one part of the planet to the other. It has been burned up to pollute the air as we drive aimlessly to the convenience store to buy a quart of ice cream and some Dexatrim.

(I will confess I've done my share of senseless, restless driving back in the day, but at long last I've grown up. I can walk, bike, or take public transportation to get where I want to go. I no longer require a personal oil-powered vehicle to carry me from place to place.)

Do we need a new technology to spare the earth, while allowing Americans in particular to continue to drive everywhere so they can avoid WALKING? Or do we need a new technology so that the Chinese and the Indians and everyone in Africa can go through a long maturing process of aimless travel, just as Americans have, only this time without causing any more damage to our fragile planet?

I'm sorry to have to be the one to tell you that - to the best of our scientific knowledge - there will be no magic technology to smoothly and cleanly let us carry on our thoughtless lifestyle when the oil runs low. Technology is not the answer to our many problems.

Learn more about this author, Paul Kemp.
Contact this writer Click here to send Author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA