Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 86% | 108 votes | Total: 126 votes | |
| No | 14% | 18 votes |
Yes, individuals should take voluntary action to curb their energy consumption. Global issues of population, resources, climate change and potential ecological collapse are not going to go away. So there are broad ethical reasons why individuals should curb their energy consumption.
There are also good sensible personal reasons why an individual's better off curbing energy consumption. Most of the ways individuals can curb energy consumption also save them money! They may contribute to better health if you're driving less and walking or bicycling more. They may save money at the grocery if you start growing some of your own produce in the yard, organically. If you recycle clothing by mending it or buying used clothing at thrift stores, your clothing bill will go way down.
I'm a disabled man living with my daughter, son in law, two grandchildren, a Siberian husky and a shaggy Siamese cat in a nice little suburban house in the Midwest. Outside these walls, our lives look pretty much like anyone's. The front yard's got clipped grass, a nice tree and some flowers in the spring and summer. The house is in good shape.
Doing maintenance on your house will seriously lower energy consumption and thus energy bills. Becoming a homeowner is itself good economic sense - each month's mortgage note paid is an investment in your own equity instead of dripping into a landlord's pocket, so frugality is served and so is independence. Homeowners find it a lot easier to reduce energy consumption because in apartment buildings, decisions like insulation or adding a heat exchanger are up to the landlord, not the resident.
One of the subtle differences between our house and others is the way we just plain generate less garbage. Trash uses energy to remove it, to process it, to deal with it. We're all do it yourselfers. This type of hobby makes for lower energy consumption and less spending, because time gets taken up making good permanent objects for use that we love and take care of and hang onto for years instead of replacing with the latest thing from the store.
We don't buy many packaged foods. My daughter and son in law both enjoy cooking, he likes to smoke meat and she's a pastry chef who used to work for a fancy New Orleans hotel and a good upscale bakery before she became a freelance writer. So we cut out things like breakfast cereal. How does that lower energy consumption? Look at the packaging and the amount of factory processing that goes into making a box of breakfast cereal - or those cute plastic wrapped packages of little individual serving boxes so that everyone gets to choose a favorite flavor.
Instead she gets flour, oatmeal, eggs, ingredients and we eat muffins, pancakes, hot cereal with any number of fancy toppings because it's simpler to just get raisins and brown sugar and cranberry sauce in bulk. For pennies on the dollar, we are all eating fancy restaurant breakfasts done to order to everyone's personal taste, versus eating an overpriced item that's not even seen as a luxury. Most people look at cold breakfast cereal as necessity, and forget that oatmeal is a breakfast cereal too.
The result is that our food budget dropped to miniscule compared to most people's, the quality of what we eat went up through the roof and we are using less energy. It does mean learning to cook. It takes skill to conserve energy and consumption to that level - but it can be deeply satisfying to start fixing everything the way you like it, not relying on the standardized tastes of food testers in a company that isn't even in your region.
Almost all of the things that can conserve energy are also frugal things that can save a person's budget and increase quality of life. Curbing energy consumption is not an either-or. It's not about giving up luxuries. It's about reducing inanities and paying attention to the real things in life, enjoying them for what they are.
Take car pooling. It's a simple thing, making some social arrangements, coordinating with other people who have to commute to the same general place you do. It cuts the expenses of the car poolers in half for necessary transit and it saves the environment because one less car is on the road, it reduces traffic. These measures to curb energy consumption benefit the individual immediately.
Big decisions like choosing whether to rent or own, choosing where to live and work, choosing occupation can be made with an eye to reduce energy consumption in the long term. All the little frugalities like passing up breakfast cereal and not buying anything we don't actually use and enjoy can add up to the means to purchase what you live in - and thus wind up in a better economic situation too. Working near or in your home is the ultimate energy saver. Anyone who can telecommute with a computer has also pulled a car off the road, and reduced the amount of energy used in the building the company's housed in, freed up that space - and gets to work in their shorts if they want.
Even when I did rent and work outside jobs, before my disabilities got this bad, I tended to choose apartments very close to my workplace to reduce the amount of time it took to get to work. I did that because I resented losing the time. Three hours a day wasted riding buses was not my idea of a happy life. But my choosing that for my own convenience and pleasure also meant that bus was less crowded on its longer route. If it became more of a factor in people's choices, public transportation would be less burdened. And of course if more people used that even when they can afford a vehicle, the pressure would be on for towns and cities to put in good public transportation.
We have toddlers in the house. Common sense applies to these decisions. We're not going to turn down the thermostat and risk the children's health or my health. But good insulation, good windows and caulking, good home maintenance reduces that - and cooking more in the winter adds to the overall heat in the house. It's as true today as it was in the 1900s that if you run the oven it will heat up the house too. Taking energy consumption into your decisions is a way to start noticing waste in general, and some decisions may be more practical for some people than others.
We turn lights out in rooms we're not actually using, but don't stint them when we do things that need light. Much of energy conservation is a matter of creating habits that become frugal, and the results show up in smaller bills every month. We're looking into getting a faucet-based water heating system that would cost a bit to put in - and pay for itself in lower energy bills in a few years, while providing unlimited hot water for baths, showers, handwashing and cooking. Science keeps coming up with greener technology, so newer can sometimes be a lot better.
My daughter recently had to replace the washer and dryer - and the new high efficiency ones use a lot less electricity. We have toddlers, those big machines run constantly keeping the children clean. We use cloth diapers. Disposables may be easier, but they're a huge source of pollution - and the cloth ones just need washing, not buying again and again. The money saved can go toward toys and food and games and things the children want as well as need. Once again, the environmentally sound choice is also the cost-cutting one!
So don't think of curbing energy consumption as some grim puritanical sacrifice. It's not. It's tightening the belt on things you don't want - garbage, long commutes, expensive yet poor quality clothing, boring standardized packaged foods, so that you can afford the things you do want and enjoy good meals, comfortable clothing, more time to enjoy your life and a better quality of life. Why bother paying extra for inconvenience just to wreck the environment? Most energy-cutting decisions work on all levels, and having more spending money is a better motivator than high ideals when it comes to changing habits.
Learn more about this author, robertsloan2.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
If you take a microcosmic view and examine each individual's use of energy, there will always be places where energy, even significant amounts of energy can be saved. Indeed the high cost of energy has affected and in fact altered many aspects of our lives. Most individuals and families HAVE reduced their consumption of energy, especially since the massive increase in gasoline and heating oil prices. It is easy to compile statistics showing how much energy has been USED in America, but it is almost impossible to form even a vague idea of how much energy has been SAVED by voluntary conservation. What is apparent from the energy statistics is that America remains a massive consumer of energy. That is to say, that the present level of consumer conservation has really made little impact in the overall energy consumption picture. You know YOU are saving energy, I know I am saving energy, and yet this level of energy conservation is not enough to significantly alter the per capita energy consumption figures for the US.
This lack of impact suggests that the problem with energy consumption in the US is systemic and it does not really respond to the efforts of the individual to conserve. A PROFOUND change in every aspect of American life would be required to alter the energy consumption picture. And this profound change will likely never come about.
We are a nation of long commutes. People daily drive 30, 50, 60 miles to and from work daily. Carpooling is not the answer. Even a heavily used urban rail system like BART runs at a massive loss and talk of light rail will remain "just talk". We are a nation of shopping malls and supermarkets surrounded by acres of parking lots because it is indeed necessary to drive to them. We are a nation were the economics and supposed advantaged of large schools outweighs bussing of students, and high schools are also set behind acres of parking for the students' cars.
Taking an even larger "snapshot" of energy consumption. Most of our clothing and consumer products, including large items like refrigerators, ranges, and washer dryers are manufactured half-way around the world. Should you buy those cheap grapes from Chili knowing that energy was a lot of energy was expended to bring them to your supermarket? Is there really any point in expending the huge amounts of energy necessary to maintain the international space station, let alone put a Humvee-sized rover on Mars? Without getting into the causes and rationale of the War on Terror, an absolutely fantastic amount of fuel is used maintaining two carrier battle groups, air-lifting supplies half-way around the world, creating, transporting, and expending smart weapons.
As individuals we are really powerless to alter the root causes of America's energy consumption. At best we can trim away at the branches. Philosophically, it probably would be better to read a book than to crash through the woods on an ATV; to play some catch with the kids in the yard rather than rot in front of the wide-screen plasma TV; to get a canoe instead of a personal watercraft and sweep up the leaves with a broom rather than firing up a leaf-blower. Judged by the strict criteria of energy consumption, we are indeed a nation of wastrels. However, the consumer culture is constantly expanding and is indeed actively encouraged. It is seldom even editorially decried!
If you look at home construction, backhoes have been replaced by power shovels, land is contoured and sculpted for even modest personal homes, fill is brought in. These are really new developments within the past 20 years. "Labor-saving" devices, which are of course energy-consuming devices, do more than save manual labor. Through the use of energy they have altered the scope of work a contractor can perform for his client, and raised the expectations of the consumer.
Look at the equipment used in today's road construction and repair. It is vastly different from that use 20 years ago. The "Industrial Revolution" is not over. We have passed the "classic" of applying a portable prime-mover to relieve labor, and entered an almost "baroque" phase of energy use. It is a bit unseemly but not unfair to call this "Progress" or at least it is the shape that progress has taken. Future generations might indeed wish that the process might have been guided more intelligently, less wastefully, more responsibly. However, at this time, if you take a sort of instantaneous snapshot of how energy is used, the reason the US uses more energy per capita is that we have made the most "progress" in the world. That progress has taken the form of long commutes and magnet malls, drive-in junk food, and cheap clothing made in distant countries is disheartening. However, you are not going to overturn these massive systemic and indeed philosophic problems by replacing your incandescent bulbs with fluorescents!
Learn more about this author, Michael Copley.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.