Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Government & Policies

Should the government's first priority be to protect secrets or to proactively give citizens information?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

Protect
40% 48 votes Total: 121 votes
Give
60% 73 votes

Protect

by David Furritus

Created on: January 01, 2008   Last Updated: November 24, 2008

Okay, if you're an intelligent person that is pretty responsible with important information then you'd have no problems with government secrets - and you'd also be in a minority.

The average American loves to gossip. The most popular newspapers in this country are tabloids that reveal all of the latest happenings of famous people. The average water cooler is laced with people that talk about everyone else in the office. Now, imagine these people talking about military troop movements and foreign policy decisions.

It's a bit of a catch 22. Society wants to feel safe from anything that might hurt them. They want to know that the government is keeping terrorists at bay. They want to know that serial rapists aren't going after their children. They want to know that they won't get held up if they go to a convenient store - but they seem to despise the people that do these things because they're afraid of losing their "freedoms" to them.

Every day, those that defend our freedoms have to work to find those that don't. This process doesn't happen quickly and often takes a great deal of time just to track down these bad guys. Now, if every time we turned around the government was telling the common American what they were doing they'd be as good as dead - or the bad guys would be able to stay one step away from them.

People love their own secrets and it seems that the same people that want the government to reveal all of their secrets are paranoid of the government finding out everything they know. Here's a clue for you: The Average American's secrets wouldn't concern the government, let alone those that wish to undermine it.

One last thing to remember: terrorists watch CNN, FoxNews, and even MSNBC. To them, it's like free intelligence.

Find Your Own Covert Truth.

Learn more about this author, David Furritus.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Give

by Charles Ray

Created on: July 04, 2009   Last Updated: July 08, 2009

Government exists to provide for the welfare of its citizens. In America, the founding fathers intended for government to be the servant of the people, not their master. In order to remain true to our founding ideals, government must be responsive to the will of the American public, and must encourage greater citizen participation in civic and government institutions.

Obsession with secrecy, with deals made in smoke-filled rooms out of the public view and without public input, is counter to the American way of life as envisioned by our founders and enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

There is a valid need to protect certain information. Intelligence sources and methods, for instance, need to be held closely to avoid compromise of our security and for the safety of those involved in the collection of intelligence. Details of military operations need to be guarded to avoid an adversary having advance knowledge and endangering the safety of U.S. forces. When the government is engaged in sensitive international negotiations, it should have the right to safeguard negotiating points and strategies.

Beyond these issues, disclosure of which could endanger our national security, government should be proactive in providing information to citizens.

An example of excessive secrecy in the last administration was the refusal to disclose details about meetings held in the Vice President's office with officials of energy companies to discuss national energy policy. While the desire to get candid input from the participants was understandable, the outcome of those discussions had a potentially significant impact on the lives of every American. Maintaining confidentiality was justified only until the meetings were concluded. Americans have a right to know what has been done or decided when it will affect their standard of living. If they are to be truly effective, and garner broad public support, such policy discussions should also include input from the public.

The result of such in camera discussions is erosion of the people's trust in government - trust that is essential if government is to retain the people's support, and in order to be able to successfully implement policy decisions.

The only way for government to be held truly accountable to the people is for a proactive policy aimed at providing citizens with all the information they need to make rational, informed decisions.

"The foundation of government of a nation must be built upon the rights of the people, but the administration must be entrusted to experts." Sun Yat-sen, The Three Principles of the People.

If, however, those experts are to continue to enjoy the support and trust of the people, they must keep them informed and involved in that administration to the greatest extent possible.

Learn more about this author, Charles Ray.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA