Search Helium

Home > Computers & Technology > Internet > Internet Issues

Pornography on the Internet: Free speech or subject to regulation?

Results so far:

Regulate
54% 652 votes Total: 1213 votes
Free
46% 561 votes

Regulate

by Elizabeth M Young

Created on: February 16, 2010

Pornography on the internet is free speech, that is sure. Graphic sexual content has been a part of human expression for as long as there have been humans. As human interaction developed into higher social forms, the need to regulate activity and content became more codified and refined. When the concept of free speech came about, the concept of using whatever means available to depict sex and to express sexual content came along with it.

But the content of pornography is also something that the public has a right to block so that it does not show up against their will. In other words, some free speech rights also comes with protections for those who do not want to hear it or see it against their will.

Some speech and expression is "outrageous" to the public. As a result, the public is allowed some power to restrict access to or to block public expressions that exceed the standards of outrageous speech. Of course, what was outrageous 200 years ago is commonplace in the public arena now, but there are still categories of expression that remain repugnant enough to require limits, whether they exist on line or in the real world.

One of the most fundamental problems with pornography or graphic depictions of sexual activity is the alarming amount of pornography that involves unwilling and illegally underaged participants.  Social and legal boundaries that are almost universal are violated in some cases, and using children in pornographic works is one of those universal boundaries.

There are other excesses in depicting graphic sexual content, such as "snuff" films, using sex slaves, kidnapped women and children, or in depicting the more psychologically sadistic, disturbed and harmful content that is clearly criminal activity. As a result, not only does this material need to be removed, it needs to be investigated and the participants brought to justice.

In cases where children are exposed to material that is even of a borderline graphic sexual nature, there should not only be an expectation of rights to free speech, there should be criminal investigations and sanctions. Examples are links which fraudulently direct web surfers to pornographic sites, predation where graphic sexual discussions or content invade areas that are set up for the under aged to interact, and on public library computers.

The most powerful force in protecting children from on line pornographic content is the parental and guardian supervision that provides monitoring, blocking, and in-home sanctions for voluntarily accessing such material. The world will never be a safe place for unsupervised and unmonitored children and parents, grandparents and guardians need to realize that.

If public libraries are allowed to eliminate pornography from their book catalogues, then they should be allowed to block or restrict access to online pornography. No amount of free speech requires unlimited and unrestricted material to be stocked at the community and taxpayer expense.

Fortunately, most organized social networking forums and sites have flagging and complaint mechanisms, as well as tight terms of use agreements that allow the control and sanction needed to prevent involuntary exposure to outrageous content.

In summary, while there are rights to free speech in an enlightened society, there will never be unlimited rights to free speech in any society.



Learn more about this author, Elizabeth M Young.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Free

by Garrett Anderson

Created on: October 31, 2009

The insanity of the human mind tries to control the exterior world by regulating it. That is always our reaction. We see something, judge it as good or bad, and acquire a belief system. Then in furtherance of promoting that belief system and gaining support- we persuade, argue, fight, and litigate the issue as we try to impose our belief systems on the eventual losers and "win." All of that energy turns negative and hostile and if the issue causes us enough fear, we might be willing to kill you or die trying to prove ourselves correct.. In fact, free speech was one of the issues that we human beings were willing to die for. There is a better solution. It has always been available.

I don't know of anyone that fought to the death trying to promote pornography. But, I do know people who fought to the death to obtain liberty, freedom, and thus free speech. If you are not willing to die for pornography but you are indeed willing to die for free speech; then it stands to reason that free speech must be more important.

The world is filled with things that we find dis-tasteful or things that we intuitively know are wrong. In that sense, we judge the issue at hand and determine if that issue is something we want to engage in or not. We make that decision for ourselves, perhaps our children.

But rather than try to impose those beliefs on others beyond our inner circle, we find acceptance. Acceptance is always a better solution.

When we uncover a societal dilemma, whether it is pornography, racism, or illicit drug use, we accept that it is true and that it exists. We are not condoning nor condemning the issue. We are simply admitting that we are powerless individually to control or regulate it's existence in our exterior world. Acceptance requires us to acknowledge that the issue at hand is a problem or a potential problem and that in all likelihood it will never go away. It is human. We instruct, teach, evaluate, and communicate our beliefs within the family setting. We form consensus within ourselves and our loved ones. But we must never be willing to compromise free speech in order to achieve our individual beliefs. That is Pandora's Box. Once we open that box and sacrifice free speech on any emotionally charged issue to achieve our goals, then we will lose our right to free speech entirely. If we become willing to set aside free speech for the sake of outlawing pornography-then others will be willing to sacrifice free speech for other controversial issues. Soon there will be hundreds of issues wherein free speech will be sacrificed. Then one day, we will wake up and no longer have free speech. It will be regulated out of existence. Rendered useless. We will not be free to speak.

In fact, our inability to exercise free speech in England was how we landed here. There is a reason why our military knocks out communication systems first when attacking an enemy. Free speech is our nations internal communication system. It gives us the means to discuss, evaluate, and build consensus. To live our lives and decide collectively what is best for us. That is freedom.

Free speech is a sacred belief and a good one. There are thousands of little white crosses in places like Arlington National Cemetery where people were willing to die so that we could engage in free speech. We must always remember that free speech is a far more valued and prized possession than any subordinate issue like pornography. Whether its on the Internet or not. Pornography is here. Accept that it doesn't really matter whether pornography is protected speech or not. Teach your children core values, teach them the greater value of free speech, and be grateful that you can.

Learn more about this author, Garrett Anderson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA