Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > US Economy
Results so far:
| No | 57% | 422 votes | Total: 746 votes | |
| Yes | 43% | 324 votes |
No
Created on: June 05, 2009 Last Updated: July 22, 2009
A better question than "Will the real estate market rebound soon?" would be, "CAN the real estate market rebound soon?" The short answer is no. Investors talk about the fundamentals. A majority of housing fundamentals for the foreseeable future are not promising. The negatives are wide, deep and extend well into the future.
The American dream has been shattered. No longer is an owner-occupied home the foundation of our economic stability. In the late 1970s when Congress passed the Franks/Dobbs red-line laws, which forced banks to loan money for mortgages in high risk communities and then added penalties if the banks failed to ignore red-line warnings statistics, the stability of home loans had nowhere to go but down. Americans are paying that price today. A bumper sticker put it very succinctly: "Honk, if I'm paying your mortgage."
For the future, the eight-hundred pound gorilla in the room is hyper-inflation. Add to that the usurpation of power by the federal executive branch of government to dictate executive compensation, whether by way of company acceptance of TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) funds or by way of the presidential bully pulpit, it bodes ill and is a leading indicator of presidential efforts to control all wages. The same executive compensation control efforts are being applied to banking and brokerage firms and a number of other economic sectors that are becoming executive compensation targets as well.
The reason executive compensation is a critical factor in the housing market is that it is a leading edge factor in wages. When executive wages go down, employee wages are not far behind, and the domino effect reigns.
Consider when General Motors Chief Executive Officer, Rick Wagoner stepped down. He was pressured by the White House to resign his post despite assurances that once GM accepted government TARP funds, the company could move forward. There was a tacit commitment by the Barack Obama Administration that there would be no retaliation against executives. That commitment, obviously, was not kept. Now, that threat, like the sword of Damocles, hangs over all executives, whether they have accepted TARP funds or not.
Already the threat has filtered down to wage earners. Wages and benefits for auto workers in Michigan have plummeted as the result of actions taken by President Obama. The wage threat pressures are being applied in a different way against workers. It's through union worker concessions, despite the perception that Obama is union friendly.
By being forced into bankruptcy by Obama, GM has renegotiated contracts reducing further United Auto Workers wages and thus their ability to buy or build new homes or even buy existing homes.
Auto parts suppliers, by default, are the second tier of this wage plunge. When they are faced with order reductions, jobs are the first to go, followed closely by cuts in wages and benefits. The spreading cutbacks eat into a buyer's home purchasing options.
Some economists refer to a concept called primary jobs and the multiplier effect. They are fundamental jobs that create a need for satellite jobs or jobs that are required to serve the primary job. A UAW member or any basic manufacturing job worker needs mechanics, teachers for his children, doctors and dentists, grocers, and a host of other persons and companies to supply his personal and family needs. Although there are different ways to compute the multiplier effect and thus the number of satellite jobs, most calculate that a primary job generates five satellite jobs. When a primary job is lost, most of those five satellite jobs go with it. Once again, it has a devastating impact on the ability to buy a home.
The Midas Letter calculates that America, nationwide, is losing 23,000 jobs per day. Despite mammoth expenditure promises by the Obama administration, the job hemorrhage is not being stopped.
Without a stabilization of employment numbers and a bottoming in the economic decline, housing sales have nowhere to go but down. Yes there will some small ups and downs, but the consumer confidence levels will be bounced like Meadowlark Lemon dribbling a basketball for the Harlem Globe Trotters.
Housing inventories are still way too high. Many investors, who bought distressed and foreclosed homes, have had them repossessed by the bank for a second time because the expected economic rebound has not occurred, depressing their sale prices farther. The economic rebound is not likely to happen for another three to five years.
Unfortunately, just as the housing rebound is expected to begin, the massive infusion of the Obama hyper-inflated dollars will enter the economy. Instead of a couple of dollars chasing a Big Mac, it will be ten to fifteen. The most likely impact could well be hyper-inflated housing prices causing continued fear and instability.
Interest rates will also face a very bumpy ride as China takes steps to move out of the dollar, meaning they will no longer finance our debt because we will be printing money with no value base.
It is the same thing that happened in the Weimar Republic and Zimbabwe today. Both experienced hyper-inflation as they printed worthless money. Zimbabwe's hyper-inflation experience provides a graphic example of the problem. A cup of coffee there, rose to one-billion dollars, yes that's billion with a "B." The government simply said we are going to drop the zeros and kept printing money.
Despite the feel-good politics of hope, home buyers are scared by what could happen to interest rates, inflation, continued job losses, and a host of unstable economic indicators. It isn't so much the fact that there is a huge economic disruption; it's whether the policies being implemented by this administration will provide the long-term confidence necessary to see a fundamental stabilization. So far there are few if any signs that, that is happening.
Bankers were recently ordered to do an exhaustive report and examination of their loan procedures and policies. They were required to examine loans that were approved for the past several years. Aside from the cost of the accounting nightmare, the results were horribly counter-productive to the administration's orders for banks to increase the number and amount of loans.
A banker friend calls this phenomenon "front door examiners" and "backdoor examiners." The front door examiners are the political faces of the administration and its policies. These people demand that banks loan money as fast as possible to stimulate the economy. At the same time, the backdoor examiners are scrutinizing loan practices, finding them inadequate and requiring even more stringent regulations to allow loans with threats of fines and crimes if they don't comply.
A commercial building loan granted just two years ago, when construction was flourishing, would not be allowed under the new requirements of the "backdoor" examiners, because it would require a fifty-one percent owner-occupancy to qualify. That building could not be built today, even though it was fully rented before completion. Thus the "backdoor" examiners are negating the demands of the "front door" examiners and the resultant stagnation is cramping economic progress.
The problem translates directly to home sales. Jobs are being lost. Banks are more highly restricted. Wages are plunging. Inventories of houses are still way too high. Inflation circles like the great vulture that it is.
The value of a hundred-dollar bill in the next few years could possibly plunge by fifty-per cent. If you have money in the bank, upon which you are depending to help you over the bumpy road ahead , within three years it could be worth half what it is today.
With these flies in the ointment, it is somewhat obvious to infer, that the possibilities of the housing market climbing to stability in the near future is grim. Most likely, the economy will be like an anchor dragging along the bottom of the ocean, catching and breaking free for several more years. Just when we think we're anchored, the anchor will break free again.
Until, companies are set free of the confiscatory taxes being imposed on nearly every sector by taxes like cap and trade, more restrictive government regulations and an effort to eliminate America's energy dependence on governments who don't like us, and the socialistic implications of one-payer socialized medicine and higher taxes on everything, the likely hood of a turnaround in the housing market is slim indeed.
In addition to the massive government intrusion and monetary infusion already planned, a new and insidious tax is on the way. It is called the value-added-tax. I say insidious because it is a hidden tax that increases the cost of all manufactured goods. At each point along any product's manufacturing path, a tax is added. It is not listed in the sale price so you do not know how much it is. But you will notice it in the total cost of an item.
The next time you go to the store and buy a chicken, the cost of butchering it will be taxed. The cost of having the feathers plucked will add a tax. The cost of inserting it into a packaging bag will add a tax and getting it to the market will add yet another tax.
None of this adds to your value of the product. This new kind of tax is in the pipeline for our future. If all of the other costs, including energy, which is another eight-hundred pound gorilla waiting in the wings to skyrocket costs, the possibility of a rebounding housing market, is an American dream that won't be answered.
Learn more about this author, Rand E Oertle.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Yes
Created on: March 25, 2008
The real estate market is an ever-changing entity influenced by many factors. Realistically, the price of homes, especially in the western states, south-west and the east coast of the U.S., has gone out of control. Homes became so costly that the pool of qualified buyers began to shrink. Is it realistic to pay over a million and one half dollars for a three-bedroom, two-bath ranch home? Of course not! Yet, that is precisely the going rate here in the more populated areas of California.
The real estate market became so inflated through greed and market manipulation, that the same participants who helped to cause this abomination, on seeing their chance to profit diminishing, began to look for alternative loan opportunities in order to qualify unqualified buyers. So, let's review:
1. In the 1950's and 60's, nearly every working family could afford to buy a home. Homes sprang up on farm-land across the country. Supply kept the prices in check.
2. Along came the 1970's and home prices began to rise, partially fueled by skyrocketing fuel costs. Inflation ran rampant. The interest rate began to climb making homes too pricey for the average first-time home buyer. There was a pullback in prices, but ultimately, prices rebounded upwards. The same occurred in the 1980's, once again, prices rebounded. There was a smooth ride through the 1990's, but little by little, prices inched upwards.
3. By the 2000's, in some parts of the country, home prices were out-of-control.
This is when the creative lenders began to write loans with little down payment and no qualifying restraints to allow buyers to purchase homes when they could not afford to make the payments. Some used "teaser" rates, after which, the monthly payment would escalate greatly. When these folks couldn't afford their payments, they simply walked away; after all, they had made no down-payment and had no reason to stick around as their own money wasn't invested in the home.
Home prices began to fall. These same borrowers were stuck in homes that were no longer worth what they had paid for them; more reason to walk away. Home prices fell more, homes for sale flooded the market and again, values spiraled downward. In my humble opinion, this is a natural occurrence that forces the artificial value of a home downward to a more reasonable price.
Now, homes that were selling at one million five hundred thousand, might sell for a nice, round million dollars; still silly for a tract home, but, one-third less than two years ago!
My problem is that the government stepped in to save the day. Luckily, they let some amount of normalcy come to the market before they acted. No one wants to see a family lose their home; but the American dream is going the way of the dinosaur as fewer and fewer families can afford to buy a home! I am completely for a free market, but a sad time has come to the U.S. when so many, especially those at the bottom of the food chain, will never realize their dream of homeownership. Falling home prices offered those would-be homeowners a glimpse of hope.
By pumping money into the monetary system, the Fed forces interest rates down; supposedly, at least. Of late, interest rates remained high for home-buyers, even as the Fed Funds Rate was dropped lower and lower. Here's where it gets good; why didn't home-loan interest rates drop immediately? Because the banks were getting hit hard by defaults on home loans. So even as the Fed lowered the Fed Funds and Discount rates, the banks wouldn't make loans; so supply diminished even as demand for loans grew. Thus, high home-loan rates remained high. Home prices dropped, but it wasn't helping the home-loan borrower because they couldn't GET a loan. Just recently, within the past month, finally loan rates began to drop. Why? Because the Fed pumped cheap money into the market to bail out the banks.
Whew! So, do I think home values will rise again? Will the real estate market rebound? Yes. Do I think this is a good thing? You tell me; is it a good thing when a working couple with two incomes will never be able to afford a home...even though their combined income is well over a hundred grand? Personally, I don't think so.
Warren Buffet, who always has a comment to make on everything, recently said in a CNBC interview, that "we are better off than our parents are, and our children are going to do better, (financially) than we will do. I almost put my foot through the TV set! Mr. Buffet, you may be the "Oracle of Omaha" to some folks, but you need to get your head out of the Nebraska corn fields and come to speak with the thirty-somethings here in California, up in Washington state, out in New York or down in Florida.
At twenty-two years old, we owned our own home. Our own children have almost no hope of doing so, even as they enter their mid-thirties! How can one even begin to think that our children will be just fine? Waiting for your parents to die should not be your only hope of ever buying a home. And the way that things are going in Congress, our estate may not even pass to our children; instead, we can invade some other rat-hole, sand flea country with our own hard-earned money! But Buffet, among others, advocates higher tax rates, and, estate taxes.
For some reason, everyone thinks home prices are too low now! Please! I think that six hundred thousand dollars for a home in the ghetto is quite high enough. And if our kids are expected to live in the ghetto, how does that make them better-off than our generation?
As a friend recently said, "there's nothing more scary than a rich Democrat." They have no clue about how other people live, how hard our kids have to work to make rent, much less make a house-payment. But, make no mistake; the real estate prices WILL rebound soon. The powers that be will see to it, even if they have to artificially inflate the market.
Learn more about this author, Taylor Shay.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.